Private infrastructure has become one of the fastest-growing asset classes for institutional investors over the past decade.¹ Until recently, most of the fundraising had been in closed-end private equity structures. However, over the last three years the number of open-ended funds has more than doubled. What accounts for the change, and what are the relative merits of open-end and closed-end structures?

A new article from TD Global Investment Solutions looks to answer those questions.

The difference between the two structures goes far beyond an investment end date and impacts the entire life cycle of an investor's commitment. Proponents of open-ended funds highlight the natural fit between the multi-decade cash flows of an infrastructure project and the long-term objectives of investors. In addition, the client experience is much different. This is reflected in a smoother path of capital, as investors are able to access a known pool of investments and can rebalance their allocation over time, as they do with other asset classes. Rebalancing a portfolio is one of the more powerful tools in portfolio management for achieving long-term goals and better risk-adjusted returns. In a closed-end fund, investors typically can't access their capital until the end of the fund's life. This creates a non-linear path for their capital, requiring investment in a series of closed-end funds or 'vintages' to maintain the desired allocation.

Institutional investors have long invested in open-ended funds within public equity, fixed income and private real estate. Infrastructure funds have remained the outlier, having had their debut through private equity firms with mid-sized investment organizations accustomed to the closed-end structure typical in the private equity space. However, as infrastructure continues to demonstrate its value in a balanced portfolio, demand has grown among smaller institutions and investors, for whom the cost and complexity of closed-end structures may be an impediment.

While the debate is sure to continue about the relative merits of open- and closed-end funds, one thing is certain: investors have never had more options to choose from.

For more details, read the full article.

_{¹ Infrastructure Investor. As at Dec 31, 2022.
本文所包含的資訊僅供參考。內容乃出自可靠之來源匯編而成。本文並不提供任何財務、法律、稅務或投資建議。 Particular investment, tax or trading strategies should be evaluated relative to each individual's objectives and risk tolerance. This material is not an offer to any person in any jurisdiction where unlawful or unauthorized. These materials have not been reviewed by and are not registered with any securities or other regulatory authority in jurisdictions where we operate.這類資料對證券或市場狀況的任何一般討論或意見均代表我們的看法或引用來源的觀點。除非另有註明，否則這些觀點僅為所註明日期當時的觀點，並且有可能會改變。投資組合持倉、資產配置或分散投資的資訊是基於歷史數據的，因此可能會隨時變化。 This document may contain forward-looking statements ("FLS").FLS反映了目前可用數據對未來事件及／或結果的現有期望和預測。由於可能會出現在構想時未曾預料或未考慮的事件，導致實際結果與明示或暗示的結果大相徑庭，因此這類預期和預測在未來可能被證明是錯誤的。FLS並不保證未來的表現，請勿過度依賴FLS。 Any projections, targets, or estimates in this presentation are forward-looking statements and are based on our internal research, analysis, and assumptions. There can be no assurances that such projections, targets, or estimates will occur and the actual results may be materially different. Additional information about our assumptions is available upon request. Other events which were not taken into account in formulating such projections, targets, or estimates may occur and may significantly affect the returns or performance.TD Global Investment Solutions represents TD Asset Management Inc. ("TDAM") and Epoch Investment Partners, Inc. ("TD Epoch"). TDAM and TD Epoch are affiliates and wholly-owned subsidiaries of The Toronto-Dominion Bank. ®The TD logo and other TD trademarks are the property of The Toronto-Dominion Bank or its subsidiaries.}